Search | Views |
---|---|
timothy mccandless | 1,564 |
substitution of trustee | 861 |
http://www.timothymccandless.wordpress.com | 599 |
mortgage electronic registration systems inc | 481 |
timothy mccandless attorney | 342 |
california civil code 2923.5 | 318 |
california civil code 2923.6 | 300 |
mortgage electronic registration system | 292 |
timothy mccandless blog | 260 |
tim mccandless | 259 |
mers mortgage fraud | 227 |
timothymccandless.com | 222 |
loan audit checklist | 196 |
timothymccandless | 176 |
2923.5 | 158 |
mortgage audit checklist | 155 |
mers mortgage | 155 |
california civil code 2932.5 | 153 |
motion to consolidate california | 152 |
when does a substitution of trustee have to be recorded in california | 131 |
mortgage electronic registration systems | 131 |
sue your lender | 128 |
substitution of trustee california | 124 |
tim mccandless attorney | 117 |
civil code 2923.5 | 115 |
aurora loan services complaints | 115 |
http://www.timothymccandless.com | 109 |
california civil code 2823.6 | 91 |
2923.6 | 84 |
mers | 82 |
sb 1137 | 80 |
aurora loan services v. stella d. onyeu | 80 |
substitution of trustee foreclosure | 76 |
wrongful foreclosure california | 72 |
what is substitution of trustee | 70 |
california civil code section 2923.5 | 69 |
motion to consolidate unlawful detainer | 68 |
civil code 2932.5 | 68 |
tila complaint | 64 |
california civil code section 2923.6 | 63 |
foreclosure class action | 62 |
civil code 2923.6 | 61 |
timothy mccandless wordpress | 61 |
law offices of timothy mccandless | 60 |
foreclosure class action lawsuit | 60 |
timothy mccandles | 60 |
california motion to consolidate | 58 |
beating foreclosure | 58 |
ccp 1161a | 54 |
ca civil code 2923.5 | 54 |
truth in lending checklist | 53 |
loan compliance checklist | 50 |
california civil code 2924 | 50 |
mortgage electronic registration systems inc registered agent | 49 |
promissory note holder | 48 |
civil complaint template | 48 |
what is a substitution of trustee | 48 |
ccp 2923.5 | 47 |
mers problems | 45 |
how to fight an unlawful detainer | 45 |
how to sue your lender | 45 |
motion to consolidate | 44 |
motion to consolidate cases california | 43 |
sample wrongful foreclosure complaint | 41 |
mers foreclosure california | 41 |
ca civil code 2923.6 | 40 |
2932.5 | 40 |
mers california | 39 |
sb1137 | 38 |
civil code section 2923.5 | 38 |
niel garfield | 38 |
timothymccandless.wordpress.com | 38 |
tim mccandless blog | 37 |
eloise figueroa | 37 |
livinglies.wordpress.com | 37 |
mortgage loan audit checklist | 37 |
mers class action | 37 |
mers florida | 36 |
lasalle bank v. lamy | 36 |
substitution trustee | 35 |
securitized mortgage litigation | 35 |
mers issues | 34 |
invalid foreclosure | 34 |
california substitution of trustee | 33 |
how to fight unlawful detainer | 33 |
timothy mccandless weblog | 33 |
fighting unlawful detainer | 33 |
ca civil code 2932.5 | 33 |
mortgage electronic registration systems, inc. | 32 |
how to stop an unlawful detainer | 32 |
ccc 2923.5 | 31 |
tim mccandles | 30 |
mers law | 30 |
wrongful foreclosure | 29 |
truth in lending audit | 29 |
ccp 2932.5 | 29 |
mortgage electronic recording system | 29 |
respa audit checklist | 28 |
problem with mers | 27 |
mers problem | 27 |
respa compliance checklist | 27 |
timothy mcandless | 27 |
mortgage electronic registration systems, inc | 26 |
what is mers | 26 |
foreclosure defense checklist | 26 |
mortgage electronic registration systems inc california | 26 |
the problem with mers | 25 |
motion to consolidate cases | 25 |
senate bill no. 1137 | 24 |
california civil code 2923 | 24 |
civil conspiracy lender broker california | 23 |
truth in lending audit checklist | 23 |
wrongful foreclosure action | 23 |
ccp 2015.5 | 23 |
mers litigation | 23 |
civil code section 2923.6 | 22 |
template of a injunction and stop foreclosure in west virginia | 22 |
predatory lending checklist | 22 |
california code 2923.6 | 22 |
how to stop unlawful detainer | 22 |
california civil code section 2932.5 | 22 |
mortgage compliance checklist | 22 |
tro foreclosure | 22 |
sample tila complaint | 22 |
tim mccandless lawsuit | 21 |
aurora loan complaints | 21 |
california wrongful foreclosure | 21 |
what is mers mortgage | 20 |
mabry 2923.5 | 20 |
the law offices of timothy mccandless | 20 |
2923.5 california civil code | 20 |
what are the technical circumstances that can be used to stop the evictionon bankruptcy filed after the unlawful detainer case is lost the last day if we filed for bankruptcy in california | 20 |
motion to stay unlawful detainer | 20 |
foreclosure attorney fees | 20 |
mortgage electronic registration | 20 |
wells fargo wrongful foreclosure | 19 |
promissory note enforcement | 19 |
attorney timothy mccandless | 19 |
civil code section 2932.5 | 19 |
fighting mers | 19 |
law office of timothy mccandless | 19 |
civil code 2924 | 19 |
mortgage electronic systems | 19 |
2923.5 civil code | 18 |
mortgage electronic registration systems inc flint mi | 18 |
mers registration | 18 |
class action foreclosure | 18 |
ca civil code section 2923.6 | 18 |
california 2923.6 | 18 |
duly perfected | 18 |
california code 2923.5 | 18 |
mers service of process | 18 |
aurora loan services v. stella d. onyeu. | 17 |
mortgage electronic | 17 |
garcia v. homeq servicing corp. | 17 |
2823.6 | 17 |
timothy mccandless esq | 17 |
2923.6 california civil code | 17 |
produce the note illinois | 16 |
respa violations | 16 |
ccp 2923.6 | 16 |
foreclosure cases, 521 f. supp. 2d 650, 2007 | 16 |
truth in lending audits | 16 |
strategic bankruptcy | 16 |
mers california foreclosure | 16 |
amhsi mortgage company | 16 |
mccandless timothy | 16 |
california code section 2923.5 | 16 |
“timothy mccandless” | 16 |
california civil code 2823.6(a) | 16 |
hoepa checklist | 15 |
timothy mccandless.com | 15 |
mers real estate | 15 |
wrongful foreclosure complaint | 15 |
mers issue | 15 |
ca civil code section 2932.5 | 15 |
mortgage registration systems | 15 |
fight unlawful detainer | 15 |
eb5 visa processing time | 15 |
invalid substitution of trustee | 15 |
californin 2932.5 | 15 |
servicer substitution fo trustee | 15 |
“substitution of trustee” | 15 |
mers attorney | 14 |
cal civil code 2923.5 | 14 |
foreclosure ways to stay in house after eviction | 14 |
timothy mcandles | 14 |
cal civ code 2923.5 | 14 |
mers mortgages | 14 |
wrongful foreclosure class action | 14 |
holder promissory note | 14 |
mccandless foreclosure | 14 |
mortgage electronic registration systems inc. | 14 |
foreclosure class action suits | 14 |
mers short sale | 14 |
2923.5 declaration | 14 |
california civil cde 2923.5 tro | 14 |
unlawful detainer delays | 14 |
pretender lenders | 14 |
wrongful foreclosure complaint california | 13 |
perata mortgage relief act | 13 |
renters in foreclosure what are their rights | 13 |
where does the fraud begin | 13 |
oliver@ipa.net | 13 |
http://www.mariokenny.wordpress.com | 13 |
subsitution of trustee | 13 |
calif civil code 2923.5 | 13 |
holder of promissory note | 13 |
linda harris de novo financial solutions | 13 |
respa predatory loan remedy lawsuit instructions | 13 |
california assignments must recorded | 13 |
mers officers | 13 |
california complaint template | 13 |
brett mearkle | 13 |
california 2923.5 | 13 |
ex parte application for stay of execution | 13 |
how to sue mers | 13 |
sb 94 | 13 |
stop unlawful detainer | 13 |
timothy mccandless attorney ca | 13 |
mortgage electronic recording systems | 13 |
11 usc 362 | 13 |
electronic mortgage registration system | 13 |
related:www.mersinc.org/ mers | 13 |
sue lender | 12 |
california 2932.5 | 12 |
tila foreclosure | 12 |
ca civil code 2924 | 12 |
mark brajnikoff | 12 |
civil code 2823.6 | 12 |
can fight unlawful detainer | 12 |
produce the note california style | 12 |
tender foreclosure california | 12 |
how do i sue predatory lender in california | 12 |
substituion of trustee: code violation | 12 |
foreclosure class actions | 12 |
tim mccandless, attorney at law | 12 |
substitution of trustee in california | 12 |
mabry v. aurora loan services, case number g042911 | 12 |
wrongful foreclosure cases | 12 |
mortgage loan compliance checklist | 12 |
timothymccandless’s weblog | 12 |
jeffrey dembicer | 12 |
motions to avoid foreclosure eviction | 12 |
pretender lender | 12 |
american broker conduit respa tila violations | 12 |
mers registered agent | 12 |
banks summary judgement for unlawful detainers | 12 |
john mendaros | 11 |
moore v. munger unlawful detainer demurrer | 11 |
timothy mccandless foreclosure | 11 |
http://timothymccandless.wordpress.com | 11 |
ccc 2932.5 | 11 |
taylor v deutsche bank | 11 |
fight mers | 11 |
template adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court-fight foreclosure | 11 |
injunction to stop foreclosure in california | 11 |
mers litigation california | 11 |
countrywide property | 11 |
foreclosure sample civil discovery california | 11 |
stay of execution eviction | 11 |
lending compliance checklists | 11 |
sample complaint for wrongful foreclosure | 11 |
problems with mers | 11 |
vella v. hudgins | 11 |
predatory lending audit | 11 |
carter v. deutsche bank | 11 |
how to stop a unlawful detainer | 11 |
litigation against mers | 10 |
ccc 2923.6 | 10 |
motion to consolidate unlawful detainer california | 10 |
california civil code 2823.6(b) | 10 |
california civil code 2923.5 effective date | 10 |
california code 2932.5 | 10 |
motion to consolidate ca | 10 |
wrongful foreclosure damages | 10 |
class action mers california | 10 |
tim mcandless | 10 |
temporary restraining order to stay the eviction | 10 |
tort wrongful foreclosure | 10 |
timothy mccandless law | 10 |
mers fraud | 10 |
mortgage electronic re | 10 |
tila sample complaint | 10 |
california mers rulings | 10 |
invalid notice of default | 10 |
tim mccandless foreclosure | 10 |
section 2923.5 | 10 |
unlawful detainer trial | 10 |
mers violations | 10 |
motion to quash unlawful detainer | 10 |
aurora loan services lost note | 10 |
sue the lender | 10 |
no assignment no foreclosure | 10 |
what is mortgage electronic registration systems inc | 10 |
aurora loan services | 10 |
cal civil code 2932.5 | 10 |
johnny mendaros | 10 |
mortgage electronic registration systems, inc. californa legal cases | 10 |
unlawful detainer motion to consolidate | 10 |
invalid trustee substitution | 9 |
mortgage fraud mers | 9 |
timothy mccandless, attorney at law | 9 |
foreclosure defense george gingo book | 9 |
issues with mers | 9 |
hoepa audit | 9 |
assignee liability respa | 9 |
tim mc candless blog | 9 |
injunction foreclosure california | 9 |
eviction timothy | 9 |
mers california court | 9 |
affirmative defenses unlawful detainer | 9 |
individual foreclosure stories | 9 |
2923.5 effective date | 9 |
trout v trout 220 cal 652 | 9 |
wrongful foreclosure tort | 9 |
tim mccandless esq | 9 |
mers electronic | 9 |
california civil code 1161a | 9 |
substitute trustee california | 9 |
how to stop foreclosure timothy mccandless e | 9 |
http://timothymccandless.wordpress.com/join-the-class-action-to-enjoin-wrongful-foreclosures/ | 9 |
save your home post foreclosure!! facing unlawful detainer action? | 9 |
timothy mccandless esq. | 9 |
california civil code 3301 | 9 |
california civil complaint template | 9 |
complaint for non-compliance 2923.5 | 9 |
lending audit | 9 |
motion summary judgment template | 9 |
ex parte app for tro template ca | 9 |
app for tro for foreclosure | 9 |
maher soliman | 9 |
attorney fees for foreclosure | 9 |
where’s the note who’s the holder | 9 |
california class action wrongful foreclosures | 9 |
service of process on mers | 9 |
sample predatory lending complaint | 9 |
california civil code §2932.5 | 9 |
pcu2008032 | 9 |
mers and mortgage fraud | 9 |
mers in california | 9 |
how to sue your mortgage company in federal court and get your deed | 9 |
greenpoint brokers targeted by new york | 9 |
mortgage electronic reg sys | 9 |
foreclosure tro | 9 |
mers california litigation | 9 |
substitution document | 9 |
substitution of trustees | 9 |
mers foreclosure problems | 9 |
does an nod have to be notorized | 9 |
substitution of trustee foreclosure california | 9 |
melissa tomlin mers | 9 |
timothy mccandless california attorney | 9 |
timmothy mcandles | 9 |
mers in florida | 9 |
tro foreclosure california | 9 |
ca civil code section 2923.5 | 9 |
california civil code section 2923.5(b) | 9 |
pharns genece | 8 |
unlawful detainer demurrer sample california | 8 |
downey savings foreclosures | 8 |
ex parte motion to consolidate unlawful detainer action | 8 |
stopping unlawful detainer | 8 |
501-228-0877 | 8 |
ca duly perfected title after foreclosure | 8 |
jeff dembicer | 8 |
motion to consolidate california superior court | 8 |
mortgage electronic registration systems foreclosure | 8 |
sample wrongful foreclosure complaint, 2923.5 | 8 |
mortgage electronic registry system | 8 |
cal. civ. code § 2923.5 | 8 |
california civil code 2923.5(c) | 8 |
timothy mccandless legal documents in all motions in foreclosure | 8 |
class action wrongful foreclosure | 8 |
respa checklist | 8 |
timothy candless | 8 |
truth in lending compliance checklist | 8 |
badbizfinder | 8 |
mers corporate charter | 8 |
cc 2923.6 | 8 |
bankruptcy unperfected mortgage | 8 |
ca 2923.6 | 8 |
ca civil code 2823.6(b) | 8 |
foreclosure defense options | 8 |
how do you present issues of standing in court when your lender has filed foreclosure on your home | 8 |
lime financial tila respa violations | 8 |
how much are attorney fees for foreclosure | 8 |
after the short sale i have second loan heloc purchase money chase bank put to the collection agency but is c .a law | 8 |
mers cant no foreclosure in californai | 8 |
unlawful detainer defense to 1161a | 8 |
2046 balance sheet as it relates to the original loan | 8 |
foreclosure cases+countrywide+california | 8 |
california tender rule | 8 |
tro to stop foreclosure | 8 |
complaints against aurora loan services | 8 |
truth in lending audit program | 8 |
timothy l. mccandless esq | 8 |
pro value properties inc v quality loan service corp | 8 |
kevin lamson | 8 |
mers loses in court | 8 |
mortgage mers | 8 |
sue my lender | 8 |
ex parte application | 8 |
california civil code 2932 | 8 |
petition to cancel note and mortgage, claim in recoupment, | 8 |
napa county procedure to evict tenant after sheriff’s foreclosure sale pursuant to a writ of execution, california | 8 |
timothy mccandels | 8 |
bank of america foreclosure fraud | 8 |
mccanless complaint for illegal foreclosure | 8 |
site:timothymccandless.wordpress.com tim mccandless attorney | 8 |
when was 2923.5 enacted | 8 |
timothy mccandless law firm | 8 |
foreclosured and facing eviction | 8 |
wrongful foreclosure california complaint | 8 |
california vs mers | 8 |
fight foreclosure california | 8 |
timothy mccandless motion for summary judgement | 8 |
mortgage electronic registry systems | 8 |
timothy mccandless class action no assignment no foreclosure | 8 |
ccp 1162 | 7 |
timothy mccandless defendants motion for summary judgement ud | 7 |
wrongful foreclosure template | 7 |
mortgage electronic registration system california | 7 |
california civil code 2932.5. | 7 |
cause of action wrongful foreclosure | 7 |
mortgage electronic registration systems inc mers | 7 |
countrywide rico | 7 |
(916)361-6583 | 7 |
ca civil code 2823.6 | 7 |
aurora loan services fraud | 7 |
foreclosure complaint template | 7 |
how to fight tender rule in california | 7 |
foreclosure fraud | 7 |
complaint to enjoin trustee’s sale ca | 7 |
timothy mccandless removal of beneficiary | 7 |
mers ocala florida | 7 |
california civil code 29241 | 7 |
mers mortgage problems | 7 |
mortgage electronic recording service | 7 |
nielgarfield.wordpress .com | 7 |
timothymccandles | 7 |
678-380-3752 | 7 |
plaintiff must produce note at unlawful detainer | 7 |
complaint form california stop foreclosure | 7 |
is mers a creditor | 7 |
california mccandless sample of notice of lis pendens | 7 |
commercial holdover owner after foreclosure defenses to unlawful detainer in california | 7 |
timothy mccandless sepora | 7 |
mortgage electronic system | 7 |
wrongful foreclosure california trustee sale | 7 |
timothy maccandless | 7 |
senate bill 1137 california civil code | 7 |
duly perfected title | 7 |
north american mortgage company correspondent lenders | 7 |
civil code section 2923.6 lawsuits | 7 |
aurora loan services lawsuit | 7 |
california state’s latest help for homeowners | 7 |
complaint template | 7 |
mers standing florida | 7 |
notice of non-compliance ca stop foreclosure | 7 |
chapter 11 bankruptcy individual | 7 |
stop eviction attorneys in fresno, ca | 7 |
enjoining foreclosures in probate | 7 |
forclosure class action | 7 |
timothy mccandless federal action for attempted theft | 7 |
mccandless tim | 7 |
can i sue mers | 7 |
california foreclosure mers | 7 |
timothy mccandless complaints | 7 |
tila compliance checklist | 7 |
sb 1137 declaration | 7 |
substitution of trustee quality loan service | 7 |
can mers foreclose in california | 7 |
servicer of the loan liable for the fraud of the originator of the loan tila | 7 |
timothy mccandless loan modifications | 7 |
ccc 2823.6 | 7 |
notice of motion template | 7 |
“mortgage electronic registration systems” | 7 |
wrongful foreclosure settlement | 7 |
timothy mc candless | 7 |
asuncion case re unlawful detainer | 7 |
lawyers guide for defense to an unlawful detainer | 7 |
sample form complaint california produce the note | 7 |
complaint to enjoin trustee’s sale, california | 7 |
california commercial code 3301 | 7 |
2932.5 foreclosure | 7 |
mortgage electronic registry | 7 |
carter vs. deutsche bank cal 1-27-2010 | 7 |
sample form complaint respa tila violation note | 7 |
timothy mccandless bank vs. martin, a – plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment – denied. the plaintiff as moving party has established a | 7 |
kalima robertson | 7 |
tila mortgage complaints | 7 |
forecloser news | 7 |
key elements in securitization mortgage foreclosure defense | 7 |
lawyer timothy mccandless | 7 |
-lamy a nominee of the owner of a note and mortgage may not effectively assign the note and mortgage to another for want of an ownership interest in said note and mortgage by the nominee.”) | 7 |
motion to consolidate unlawful detainer in california | 7 |
substitution of trustee california foreclosure | 7 |
what does the the new vito mean for mortgages under mers |
Search terms for this blog
30 DecWhy modify
11 DecCalifornia Loan Modification Lawyer
(Effective October 11, 2009 The McCandless Firm complies with SB 94)
By now, you may have made your own attempts at loan modification. You now know what we have known: Despite all the government and media hype, the voluntary loan modifications are not the silver bullet to the foreclosure crisis. Even after President Obama introduced the HAMP program, only about 8% of the anticipated 9 million loan modification applications have been considered. Never forget that lenders and loan servicers are in the business of making money for their shareholders, not solving people’s financial problems. Despite the incentives created by the government, loan servicers remain inconsistent, negligent, understaffed, arrogant and just plain indifferent to the financial plight of most folks. If you’ve ever wondered why the bank doesn’t seem to care? Consider that it is the investor, not loan servicer, takes the financial hit when a property is foreclosed. Loan servicers make more money when a borrower falls into foreclosure. Servicers have an incentive to drag out the foreclosure and loan modification process. Despite what the government and the lenders may say, the loan modification or short sale process is not as quick and easy as has been portrayed.
VIOLATIONS CAN GIVE YOU LEVERAGE to secure a “SETTLEMENT”, not a LOAN MODIFICATION.
Whether hiring a lawyer will increase your chances for success a little or a lot depends on whether the lender has done something wrong. This is why Attorney Roberts encourages every client to commission an audit of the original loan documents, review the appraisal and take measure of any agency relationships between the broker, the lender, the appraiser, the escrow and the title companies. Anecdotally, Attorney Roberts believes that your chances of success increase fourfold if there is litigation or bankruptcy. Hiring a lawyer to review your options and handle the process makes sense. Your chances of obtaining a substantial loan modification will be greatly improved if the lender has violated the law…but how will you ever know? A lawyer can help you gain negotiating leverage on your behalf by finding violations of the law or capitalizing on provisions of the bankruptcy code.
FRONT DOOR LOAN MODIFICATIONS
A loan modification can still be secured even where violations do not exist or the borrower chooses to ignore them. In California, SB94 was recently signed into law effectively banning advance fee loan modification services by even lawyers. Attorney Roberts operates in full compliance of the new law. If you hire a lawyer to provide loan modification services rather than to pursue a violation of your rights, special rules now apply and specific disclosures must be made letting you know that you can do the loan modification yourself and avoid fees.
It’s true; you can pursue a loan modification yourself, just as you have the right to represent yourself in court. And to be honest, even with a lawyer, unless a violation has occurred, you are at the mercy of the loan servicer’s interpretation and analysis of your situation. If the servicer loses your paperwork, berates you, keeps you on hold for hours, ignores you, or simply denies the loan modification without explanation…you have NO RECOURSE. You are not entitled to a loan modification and you have no right to sue if denied. Even if the lender ignores the guidelines of the government’s HAMP program, you can’t sue. When you apply for a front door loan modification, you are asking for a break. It is you and not the lender, who seeks to break the mortgage contract. You have no leverage. You cannot force the lender to give you any consideration, whatsoever. Even if you clearly qualify for a loan modification under the printed guidelines of the government HAMP program, if the lender believes that it would make more money in the long run by foreclosing, you can legitimately be denied.
Why pay a lawyer to work on your loan modification? A lawyer adds attention to detail and diligence to the process, as well as a better idea of the location of each loan servicers’ “sweet spot”. Experience and daily contact with the loan servicers provides some advantage as well. The law firm may act as a force to counter act the incompetence built into the lender’s process. Attorney Roberts and his staff simply assume that the loan mod process will be screwed up by the lender, repeatedly. The firm expects that the lenders will lose paperwork, fail to respond and provide conflicting information. The firm is not shocked when a home is improperly sold despite an approval of a loan modification as it happens all the time. The Law Office of The McCandless Firm is there to respond to these constant lender screw ups and bear the brunt of your frustration.
The The McCandless Firm is always prepared to react to the latest bank screw-up or client crisis. One of the favorite tricks of the lenders is to wait to the very last minute before the sale to approve or deny a postponement or a loan modification. This game of chicken may happen every month as the loan modification process drones on. The firm is always ready with a PLAN B if the lender, in its sole discretion, denies the modification. Having the ability to plan and execute a contingency plan, whether it be Chapter 7, 11, 13, a short sale or a federal lawsuit, is truly the firm’s core strength.
A foreclosure relief company or real estate agent is unqualified to provide you with any of this legal insight – but a California loan modification lawyer at the The McCandless Firm has the knowledge and experience to help. California attorney Joseph Arthur “Joe” Roberts can act as your legal counselor and help you get out of the financial situation that you find yourself in. With offices located in Newport Beach, attorney Roberts helps clients throughout California, including Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside County and the surrounding areas.
Loan Modification Attorney in Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside County, California
In California, voluntary loan modification programs of different companies vary. Most loans are owned in pools by “trusts” and not by the servicing agent with whom you deal. The contract between the trust and the servicing agent, called a PSA, limits the number of loans that can be modified in a given pool. Typically, the PSA limits the number of loans that can be modified in a given pool at 5%. However, that restriction is lifted in the event of a bankruptcy or litigation.
Most servicing agents are understaffed, overwhelmed and for the most part…simply don’t care about you. The servicing companies typically make more money off of late fees, costs and penalties when you remain in default. If the property gets foreclosed on, it becomes the trust’s problem, not necessarily the service agent’s. The application process can take months and usually involves rejection or a token change in the loan terms. Amid the flood of modification requests, mistakes frequently get made and the ball gets dropped. In the meantime, the countdown to foreclosure sale continues. Homeowners already under distress get left with little time to act if a modification is not granted. You need to have a backup plan in place in case the lender’s process fails.
Loan modification is driven by income and complicated when there is a second mortgage company involved. If you lack the income to fund whatever plan the lender is willing to give you, you will be denied. Even if the first mortgage company is willing to modify your loan, it doesn’t mean that the second mortgage company will play ball. In the absence of litigation or bankruptcy, the loan modifications have economic limits. A reduction in principal balance is rare. A mortgage holder will not reduce the principal balance below the value of the property. Interest rate adjustments and recapitalization of back payments are more common. However, don’t expect to get an interest only or negative amortization loan. The very best you can hope for is a fixed rate amortized over 30 years at a decent rate based on the current value of the house. Finally, if the lender “cancels” some of your debt, it may still be considered taxable income by the IRS, despite the passage of the limited Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007. Only debt from buying or improving the property is covered by the new law.
How a California Loan Modification Lawyer Can Help
loan modification process can be complex, and it is easy for a lender or servicing agent to take advantage of you. Using an experienced lawyer to assert your rights gets you to the front of the line in this process. The possibility of litigation or bankruptcy may increase your negotiating leverage with your lender. Lenders are forced to get their own lawyers involved in your case, not just an administrative person from the loss mitigation department. We welcome you to contact our firm to discuss your loan, your budget and the benefits of attorney negotiated loan modification.
Contact loan modification attorney The McCandless Firm today! Northern California 925-957-9797and in Southern California 909-890-9192
Foreclosure Deed may be Voided by Mortgage Transfer or Servicing Problems
9 DecBy Max Gardner
A Federal District Court, in a December 7 order, has denied a motion to
dismiss a homeowner’s lawsuit to set aside the nonjudicial Missouri
foreclosure sale based on a deed of trust, based on allegations that 1)
the homeowner was not in default and 2) the nonjudicial sale was baed on
an invalid transfer of the mortgage and note. This decision illustrates
the potentially broad ramifications that defective mortgage transfers
and wrongful foreclosures will have for any house titles derived from
foreclosure sales in nonjudicial foreclosure states.
More specifically, the homeowner alleges that she made all payments when
due, until instructed by the servicer to stop making payments in order
to qualify for a modification. She also submitted the mortgage transfer
documents that showed a significant break in the chain of ownership. In
a deed of trust state, instead of a mortgage the loan originator
typically files a deed of trust, which transfers a power of sale from
the homeowner to a trustee, usually a local lawyer, on behalf of the
trust deed beneficiary, who is the lender or investor. In order to
transfer the mortgage, there needs to be a transfer of the note and a
change in the beneficiary of the trust deed. This is routinely done by
filing a substitution of trustee with the local recorder of deeds. The
substitution of trustee names a new trustee with a power of sale, and a
new beneficial owner of the mortgage/deed of trust. In this case the
substitution of trustee form listed a grantor of the transfer, i.e. the
prior owner of the loan, that did not match the identified beneficial
owner of the original deed of trust. This break in the chain, according
to the court and basic logic, would render the subsequent trustee deed
invalid.
A second, independent basis for setting aside the foreclosure deed was
the alleged absence of a default. In a nonjudicial foreclosure, there
is no court judgment establishing that the homeonwer defaulted on the
loan. For that reason, a completed foreclosure sale can later be set
aside if there was in fact no default. The homeowner’s allegation in
this case was that she was current in payments until the servicer
instructed her to stop paying so that it could modify her loan. This
type of servicer-induced payment interruption can be characterized as
either nondefault based on a modification of the contract, a waiver of
the payment obligation by the servicer as agent for the mortgagee, or
perhaps a repudiation by the servicer. In any case, this scenario is
sufficiently common to raise serious questions about large numbers of
property titles in nonjudicial foreclosure states.